Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Top Guidelines Of contempt of court case law
Blog Article
Google Scholar – an enormous database of state and federal case legislation, which is searchable by keyword, phrase, or citations. Google Scholar also allows searchers to specify which level of court cases to search, from federal, to specific states.
The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The loads of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. Read more
ten . Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The legislation enjoins the police being scrupulously fair on the offender as well as Magistracy is to be sure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court in addition to from other courts Nevertheless they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.
The lots of this power casts an obligation over the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for any crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is actually made very clear that police is free to take action against any person that is indulged in criminal activities subject to legislation. eight. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two weeks, address the alleged police misconduct. Should the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-industry duties within the interim period. Read more
For that reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner needs to go after his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If such an appeal hasn't still been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may then seek out further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
Since the Supreme Court would be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has actually been arrived at, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) with the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
When the state court hearing the case reviews the legislation, he finds that, whilst it mentions large multi-tenant properties in certain context, it is actually really imprecise about whether the ninety-working day provision applies to all landlords. The judge, based around the specific circumstances of Stacy’s case, decides that all landlords are held to your ninety-day notice prerequisite, and rules in Stacy’s favor.
The court system is then tasked with interpreting the law when it can be unclear how it relates to any given situation, typically rendering judgments based around the intent of lawmakers along with the circumstances on the case at hand. This sort of decisions become a guide for upcoming similar cases.
Case law, also used interchangeably with common law, is a regulation that is based on precedents, that is definitely the judicial decisions from previous cases, somewhat than regulation based on constitutions, statutes, or regulations. Case regulation uses the detailed facts of a legal case that have been resolved by courts or similar tribunals.
Article 27 of the Constitution does not only safeguard against discrimination within the time of appointment of service but after the appointment also. The disparity during the spend scale allowances of Stenographers inside the District Judiciary is from the very clear negation on the law laid down from the Supreme Court in its a variety of pronouncements. Read more
Under Article 199, the court possesses the authority to review government insurance policies for reasonableness if applicable in respondent university and to safeguard aggrieved parties' rights. Therefore, this petition is admissible based on recognized court precedents, and also the respondents' objections are overruled. Read more
Any court could find to distinguish the present case from that of the binding precedent, to succeed in a different summary. The validity of such a distinction may or may not be accepted on appeal of that judgment to the higher court.
156 . Const. P. 1015/2021 (D.B.) Muhammad Saleem Jehangir V/S Province of Sindh and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Additionally it is important to note that neither seniority nor promotion is the vested right of the civil servant, therefore, neither any seniority nor any promotion could be claimed or granted without the actual duration of service on account of vested rights. The purpose of prescribing a particular duration of service for getting to be entitled to be regarded for promotion to the higher grade, of course, is not really without logic as being check here the officer who is originally inducted to a particular post needs to serve over the said post to gain experience to hold the next higher post and also to serve the public in a very befitting manner.
Matter:-SERVICE Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-225471 Tag:Coming into the main case, it is also a nicely-proven proposition of legislation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or summary. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of the fact or evidence from the Stricto-Sensu, utilize to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and summary acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty of the charge, however, that is subject towards the procedure provided under the relevant rules and not otherwise, to the reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-enjoy the evidence and to arrive at its independent findings about the evidence.